Phase 3 findings- indicators and judgements

During the Phase 3 Curriculum research, inspectors used 25 indicators that they expected to see associated with curriculum quality.

img_0783

As all schools are different, it is only fair that what is seen could be so varied so the indicators below are to ensure that what is seen is judged on based on the individual school.

They wanted to ensure that

  different school contexts were not judged the same

  effective and ineffective curriculum design could be distinguished

 curriculum narrowing is happening is identified

 curriculum intent  and curriculum implementation are clear from the senior leadership team.

The list is split into three parts – pink for intent, green for implementation and blue for impact. All of which I will look at in due time but it may be worth a quick look before hand.

Each of the indicators will be judged against the following five categories:

judgements

The 1-5 categories were put into place to prevent an inspector’s unconscious bias.  This is the beginning and all schools are taking a different approach, therefore it is important that we are all treated the same.

It is clear that the indicators and the five point judgements are rather  lengthy but for the time being, this is necessary as we find out what is easy to evidence and what is more relevant.  As more research is completed there may be evidence to allow for these to be refined or narrowed.  This may be irritating to some as teachers, in general like to do a good job and know that what we are doing is right but that still can be done.  In fact it is better.

At least for now, there is some chance of having an idea of what may be expected so that we can put things into place, while still keeping children at the heart!

Shaping your curriculum – Phase 3 findings

After reading the Phase 3 findings of curriculum research, some things may be important to highlight and even if you don’t fancy reading it all, http://www.blackboardonline.co.uk can give the main points.

edu-curri.jpg

Here are factors that appear related to curriculum quality from the research and other leaders, and may be worth a look.

  1. the importance of mapping subjects as individual disciplines thereby focusing on subject disciplines even when topics are taught
  2. using the curriculum to address disadvantage and provide equality of opportunity, while addressing gaps in pupils’ background.
  3. considering the local context
  4. seeing the curriculum as the progression model
  5. considering depth and breadth of curriculum content
  6. having a clear purpose for assessment which informs curriculum design
  7. revisiting and recalling previously learned knowledge ‘baked into’ the curriculum planning
  8.  regular reviewing and evaluating of curriculum design
  9. distributed curriculum leadership and ownership